Thank you for that question.
It is true that there is a disparity, at the moment. The Great Lakes program has been around for almost 50 years, so it's well developed. We have targets and results that we can measure. That's helped build momentum and continuing results. Similarly, we've had a good history of almost 30 years now of working with Quebec on the St. Lawrence action plan. We're getting there on Lake Winnipeg. We've had some very good progress. We have an MOU with Manitoba. We're starting to develop some very good targets and approaches, again, so that's gathering momentum.
We're at the stage where we need to do that now in a few other places—the Fraser, the Mackenzie and the Wolastoq being key places where we need to start to move forward. Our goal is to continue to work with people in the Fraser and the Government of British Columbia to identify the kind of science we need to do. Using that science, how can we start to develop the appropriate types of targets? What are the gaps in information that we have? From there, we can start working on an action plan. I think those will take some time for us to do, but the goal would be to go, through that collaboration, from early conversations to ones where we can make a solid case for investment.