One thing the Government of Quebec did that we supported was set up an advisory committee whose mandate was to look into this matter.
In general, we agreed with the findings of that committee, which were presented in a report published in the late summer of 2022. It's a scientific landmark, and, in light of the information we've been receiving over the past year, there are undoubtedly assertions that deserve the support of the scientific community. It's unfortunate that my colleague, Mr. Bédard, can't participate fully in the discussion, because the science part of this is more in the First Nations of Quebec and Labrador Sustainable Development Institute's wheelhouse.
That said, at the risk of repeating myself, I'll reiterate some of what I said to Mr. Deltell earlier. If we can't create a space to talk about it, the discussions end up happening in isolation and don't allow for longer-term collaboration in seeking solutions.
We believe that all the parties concerned by the fragility of the species could have been brought to the same table to have these discussions, while also soliciting input from the scientific community, of course.
I think your question points to a possibility, and that possibility still exists.