From anything you've looked at, has the government made it clear that investments in carbon capture, utilization and storage would fall under an inefficient subsidy or, just in general, a subsidy that should be eliminated?
Conservative
Kyle Seeback Conservative Dufferin—Caledon, ON
From anything you've looked at, has the government made it clear that investments in carbon capture, utilization and storage would fall under an inefficient subsidy or, just in general, a subsidy that should be eliminated?
See context to find out what was said next.