Okay. This next question is for Mr. Langlois-Bertrand.
I enjoyed your testimony. The CCUS discussion has been very interesting. You have folks on one side of the equation who think it's salvation, and folks on the other side who think it's a subsidy for the oil and gas sector. The government has invested heavily in the net-zero accelerator in a hydrogen strategy, particularly as it relates to blue hydrogen, which, from my reading of the literature, has a tremendous potential in the heavy transportation sector. Once you get that hydrogen into a truck battery, it's non-emitting, as you know.
Can CCUS be viewed as a technology development initiative, as we have done for so many other sectors? We're doing it in the battery sector right now. We've done it in various technology sectors. Does the price on pollution, as it gets to $170 a tonne, make it much more economical? Isn't that why we should be developing the technology now? My understanding is that it's competitive at about $110 a tonne, and before you know it, we will be at that level.