The industrial transition is under way, but we're not sure it's going to be fair. It's therefore important to consider the fate of the categories of workers who may be affected by changes. For a certain category of workers—and I'm thinking of forestry workers in particular—there is a package of options enabling them to continue working in their field. I was talking about silvicultural programs, for example, where these people could be used. When I gave the example of wind power, I was thinking of the megapark project in both regions, where there will be road construction to be done. It's things like that.
It should be noted that the other transition we seem to be witnessing, in other words, the consolidation of sawmills, will make volumes available. This is where the decision—to return to the word “fair”—becomes not just a business issue but a social one, too. With regard to the changes we're seeing, how can we help Sacré‑Coeur? How can we help Saint-Ludger-de-Milot, a village in Lac-Saint-Jean where a plant has announced its closure?
It's not a matter of drawing up a transition plan and saying that we're going to focus on bioproducts in Canada. No. You have to know what's being done in Saint-Ludger-de-Milot, based on the wood you can find, which isn't necessarily fir or spruce, which is used to make two-by-fours. We have to find something else. We have money, technology and expertise. We have chemists who know these things. Can we put all that together and do everything we can to help villages like Saint-Ludger-de-Milot when we see that there's a social problem? That's a fair transition plan. It's a reasoned transition based on the interests of the communities, the workers.