Yes, you understand it correctly.
In the recovery strategy that was prepared in 2012, there was a scientific correlation between the disturbance level and the recruitment of calves in the reproductive rate. In that document, given the concern around impacts to forestry and impacts to other landscape levels, there was a policy decision to acknowledge that the relationship still resulted in only a 60% probability of success.
It recognizes the impact of these policies on forestry. The very document written in 2012 already took a risk-based approach in order to minimize socio-economic impacts.