There's an awful lot in there.
For me, there's a real need, from the taxonomy question, to think about things that are genuinely transition and sustainable activities or transition finance. I think it's really important that oil and gas companies ultimately don't receive transition finance because they don't have to become anything. It's critical they move away from what they currently do, but they don't have to become anything. I think there's a real risk that companies will get financing through transitional green bonds to do potentially green things, but it actually helps to continue the financing for what they're doing.
Driving that stronger regulation is really important. That's particularly the case for things like carbon capture and storage and for things like natural gas and LNG. If you have regulations, the financial systems and the pension funds being, in some ways, hoodwinked by the industry that carbon capture and storage is a solution and that it's a climate-positive piece, that is actually one example of when the investment sector and investment community must really challenge what they are being told by industry—critically challenge it—and must not fall for, ultimately, these false solutions by industries that are perpetuating business as usual.
Crucially, government frameworks and regulation...and I've seen this through my work on a number of—