The idea that there are no trade-offs is, to me, one of the major fallacies of this kind of analysis and work. What you're seeing in Germany is a perfect example of that. Germany's economy shut down nuclear power plants and is transitioning to renewable energies, and, as a function of that, their industrial production has collapsed and their unemployment rates are rising. Their economy was centred on turning cheap energy into products that we all wanted.
One person outlined that you don't care about people. I would tell you, as a person who grew up in a working-class neighbourhood with working-class parents, that employment and a growing economy are the best ways you can improve the lots in life of underprivileged people and people who don't have fancy degrees and are certainly not consultants.
I think this idea that there are no trade-offs to constraining and basically shuttering the single most important importer of hard currency to our economy in the form of fossil fuels is, to me, very naive and, I would argue, disassociated from the fact.