Having worked for large financial institutions, I think it's important to understand how, why and when these people get paid, and it is absolutely not to meet global or countrywide green energy goals.
I'm not sure if I'm allowed to give specific names of ETFs as examples that claim to be designed to support climate initiatives or whatever, but what they do is exploit people's good intentions or noble view that emissions should be lower or what have you.
The consultants you've heard are the exact same way. If tomorrow someone invented a machine that immediately fixed climate change at the snap of a finger, those consultants would all be out of business, and I'm sure they would be reluctant to suggest that as a means to deal with this obviously very big problem.
It's very important that we keep those people's incentives front of mind and hold that fiduciary duty as a sacred totem. Those investors should be representing the financial interests of those clients, first and foremost and above all else, and allowing for legislation. If you want to ban oil and gas, bring it to Parliament and let's vote on it rather than going through the back door, which is the way I see it, and subverting the fiduciary duties these investors have on behalf of their clients.