Okay. I look forward to having him join us as a witness so that we can hear a bit more about that, but going back to some of these emails that you are so firmly confident are either out of context or you can't provide any other context to them, would you be willing to table any conversations written down, in any way, that do back up the claim of what happened behind this closed-door meeting?
Could you table something that would alleviate my concern that this was in fact about political pressure, not about a debate of mechanical removal or prescribed burns? Is there anything you could provide me to ease my mind?