Thank you very much, Mr. Chair.
I'd like to start where I finished off with Mr. Beaulieu, if I could.
There has been some confusion on this committee today, I feel, with respect to whether a taxonomy would make it mandatory or obligatory for all companies to adopt environmental, social and governance frameworks, or if they would simply have to be honest and forthcoming about the feasibility of their stated goals, as we've seen them take these on as marketing. Could you clarify that?
Mr. Damodaran implied that the adoption of a taxonomy would make some of these commitments mandatory. Is that the case?