I think there are two aspects to that answer. Certainly, the CCLI's view is that for some of the big businesses there need to be parameters about what they're required to do, and climate action plans are important. As I mentioned, 98% of businesses would be unaffected by that in this country.
I think for small businesses, the taxonomy will be very helpful if they're trying to do innovative work in clean tech, new mining technology, etc. There's no question. We worked with the mining sector. For example, we had done a mining guide, but then we did another one with several industry organizations to look at really tiny businesses that were doing either just exploration or exploration pre-development, to see what kinds of concrete steps they could take to attract capital and to show that they have a commitment without any sort of big mandatory standards.
I think it's partly a question of.... “Education” is not the right word, but actually building capacity in the small, micro economy by supporting them, as opposed to a top-down kind of thing. I think there are huge possibilities there.