You talked a bit about how EDC is currently defining clean tech. Clearly, this includes CCUS and blue hydrogen—a.k.a. fossil fuel hydrogen—in the definition of clean tech. This seems like it will impact the credibility and won't really help the reputation of EDC when it comes to financing fossil fuel subsidies.
First of all, would you mind sharing with the committee all of the transactions EDC includes in its clean tech number? That can be a follow-up to our committee, if you don't mind submitting that to us after this.
I'm curious to know if EDC has plans to come up with a clear sustainable finance taxonomy that excludes fossil fuel financing, like the Canada green bond framework, or if it's going to continue shovelling public money towards fossil fuels under the name of clean tech, which is what it sounds like.