Okay.
I will say that I appreciate the kind words of Mr. van Koeverden regarding my birthday, but I wish we could have reserved this topic for committee business. It's always pointed out to us that it's a more appropriate time. Unfortunately, we are going to lose the officials who travelled all the way across the river to get here. I think it is deeply unfortunate to see that sort of hypocrisy.
I think this is all very confusing, and not only as to what amendment we're voting on. This committee has so many things on its plate right now, and juggling....
Obviously, Mr. Chair, you worked tirelessly for years to bring forward a very robust water study, on which I'm sure the analysts have been working very diligently. I know there were a lot of witnesses and testimony to bring together, so I'm sure there's a lot of work there. I suspect you would like that study to see the light of day in a published format, but with rumours of a possible prorogation and potential early carbon tax election, I would hate to see that report not make it across the finish line and published.
Of course, this isn't the only thing we have. I appreciate the possible date of December 4, I believe, for Minister Randy Boissonnault to appear, in order to help us conclude the Jasper fire investigation. I hope he's spending a lot of time in Jasper talking to folks there and finding out—as we studied—the factors that led to the fire that devastated that community and left 2,000 people homeless. I think we also need to try to ensure we finalize that particular topic.
We have ongoing letters that need to be sent out regarding the appearance of five oil and gas CEOs before our committee, and I think we have another study or two awaiting circulation for us to review. Then, of course, there's the net-zero accelerator fund challenges we are having. My understanding is that we haven't returned to that issue—