Mr. Chair, before commenting on the subamendment, I want to reassure my colleague from Portage—Lisgar. I heard him say “kill time”. We aren't the ones killing time, but time will eventually kill us. The committee members should keep this in mind.
I'll address the subamendment. I want to comment on its admissibility. We're holding an emergency meeting today under Standing Order 106(4). This order stipulates that, if five committee members request a meeting on a topic, the committee will meet to study that topic.
The subamendment of my colleague, Ms. Taylor Roy, changes the nature of the study proposed by Ms. Pauzé, which was adopted under Standing Order 108(2). Of course, nothing prevents the committee from changing the nature of a study in progress under Standing Order 108(2). Please correct me if I'm wrong, Mr. Chair. However, we aren't meeting here today under Standing Order 108(2). Instead, we're debating a motion, an amendment and a subamendment moved in a meeting requested under Standing Order 106(4). As a result, I don't think that Ms. Taylor Roy's subamendment is admissible.