Thank you.
You mentioned a whole-of-government approach, which is a term that gets thrown around a lot. However, you also alluded to some of the silos that certainly still exist across departments.
When the government has attempted to undertake this many measures—maybe not successful measures, but measures nonetheless—and claims a whole-of-government approach, how do you explain the silos that still continue to exist, which lead to things like the double-counting of emissions, a lack of credibility in terms of modelling, and going back to the previous audit on the two billion trees program? How does that happen so frequently under this government?