This is about projections rather than historical emissions. You're referring to paragraph 7.24. I mentioned 36%, which is their calculation of what their measures add up to. Previously, the number used was 34%, I believe. What we're saying in that paragraph is that the change from 34% to 36% was not due to climate actions but to revisions to the data and methods used in the modelling. That's what we're talking about in paragraph 7.24.
