Well, they've never published a pathway between 2005 to 2030 in terms of annual targets, as we were just talking about, so I don't know what shape of graph they were hoping for. Therefore, I can't really say one way or the other whether they're following the shape of graph that they intended.
In terms of what would be required, doing the math between now and 2030 shows that we can't have any more years when there's just a 0.5% reduction or a 1% reduction. We're going to need substantial reductions every year between now and 2030 to reach the target.