If the benefits are realized, then yes. Many of them are longer term. The same conclusion could be reached in our analysis of the two billion trees program, which we did a couple of years ago.
It's actually not a bad thing to be looking far out. In fact, lesson 8 from that same report we just talked about is about taking a long-term perspective. The longer term the perspective, the harder it is to be specific about the reductions associated with it. However, there can still be some transparency about the anticipated benefits, even if they aren't going to be credibly estimated to a level where you could call them bankable reductions.