It's something under consideration. As I indicated before, I'd be more inclined to consider that if they had a plan that on paper added up to what is necessary to meet the target and that would lend itself to an analysis to see whether that actually does add up when you peel back the layers and so on. Until such time as they actually have a plan that meets 40% to 45%, it's not necessarily a great use of resources to indicate that it's an exact number below 36%, because we still just need the gap to be filled first. It's something I'll consider. I had hoped to be in a position to do that earlier, because it was in 2021 that our report said they were at 36% and needed to get to 40%, but here we are, three years later, and we have almost the same sentence in our report.
On December 9th, 2024. See this statement in context.