That's the reason I included the final paragraph in my opening statement today. If I can give you a fuller answer than just yes or no, I can explain.
I believe different people are using “on track” in different ways. I want to define how I'm using it, and it's up to the committee whether you agree with my formulation. By “on track”, I mean three things: a plan with concrete measures that add up to meeting or exceeding the target; reliable modelling of the reductions that the plan is expected to deliver; and effective implementation of actions that result in significant year-over-year reductions.
Until those three elements are seen, I believe, in the way I'm using “on track”, the Government of Canada is not yet on track.