There is a lot there.
As I mentioned earlier, there are over 140 measures in Canada, and some of them have either no emission reductions associated with them or very small emission reductions. We've looked at about 40 measures so far—20 this year and 20 in other audits, I believe.
We summarized the recent ones in appendix A of this year's report, and the newer ones that we looked at are in the body of the report. Should we look at all of them every year? I'm not sure that would be the best use of resources, because many of these measures are of marginal importance from a GHG reduction point of view. They're quite valuable from a capacity-building or an enabling point of view.
As I indicated earlier, if there were a plan that added up to at least 40%, I'd be more inclined to consider doing a deconstruction and analysis of it to see whether it really adds up. Right now, as we were in 2021, we still have a plan that doesn't add up to 40% to 45%. I'm disinclined to go through every line of every measure when we already know that it's something at 36% or lower. I don't know if this—