This has come up in several of our recent reports. The siloed approach and the lack of centralization on the climate file can lead to double counting. It could be innocuous double counting, you know, where one department doesn't know that it's also being covered by another, so there have been examples of double counting.
I guess the earliest example we had was from the emissions reduction fund, where a subsidy to the oil and gas industry was not designed in a way that would necessarily be additional to what was going to be achieved through regulation anyway, so there was a potential for double counting from the subsidy program and the regulation.
There have been other examples as well.