Absolutely.
I want to switch gears to your report on hydrogen and the difference in the figures given by ECCC and NRCan, which are obviously very different agencies. ECCC is more of a regulatory agency and NRCan is more of an economic ministry.
ECCC only modelled blending hydrogen with natural gas, which in my opinion is maybe not the most effective use of hydrogen where electrification, for instance, may be possible. Rather, hydrogen can help in hard-to-abate areas like freight and heavy transport, among others.
NRCan took a more holistic approach to looking at the roles that hydrogen can play, which in my opinion leads to a larger share of emission reductions.
You mentioned in your testimony earlier that we should be using conservative and precise figures, but for technology like hydrogen, which is rapidly progressing, how would you advise or recommend that government estimate the future potential for emissions reduction for these types of emerging technologies?