Okay, if you're not able to confirm that.... They are overlapping. The clean fuel standard was originally supposed to generate almost 30 megatonnes of reductions. Now, based on the modelling just released by the Pembina Institute, Canada will be lucky to see a three-megatonne reduction—that's 10 times less—because of this kind of double-dipping.
Are you aware that other jurisdictions—Quebec for example—expressly prohibit these kinds of double-counting schemes? Why aren't the clean fuel standard regulations being designed to eliminate this kind of double counting?