The role of the investment in CCUS is actually a good example of this approach because, maybe on the one hand, you can say, we do have this output- based pricing system for large emitters with a given stringency that will increase over time. I cannot speak to it. That's more for ECCC, but it's there. At the same time, we have this investment tax credit that encourages these same players to invest in a technology that would help reduce their emissions.
As for where these both meet, I would explain the existence of both as follows: With respect to the level of stringency, the concern is that you have to increase stringency in a manner that's not too harsh on the sector such that it affects employment, for instance. That's one thing to calibrate this properly, which leads to your argument about international competitiveness. On the ITC side, they're actually to encourage those who can, those who have access to technologies, to actually implement those sooner rather than later. Even if they may already meet their regulatory obligations under the OBPS, we want them to go further and more quickly. That's the—