I think my observation on the United States is that at the state level and the federal level, there's an acknowledgement of the importance of things like liquid natural gas and significant manufacturing capabilities that require energy-intensive steel production and petrochemical production. I think what we're seeing today in Germany is effectively an implosion of German industry. What's happening in Europe is a precise example of what happens if we are insufficiently supplied with fossil fuels. Zinc smelting, aluminum smelting and fertilizer production are substantially shut today in Germany and in Europe.
These ideas that we somehow are able to replace fossil fuels in industrial production or that industrial production itself should be punished as a polluter are being demonstrated in Europe, and they don't work.
In the United States, the section 45Q tax credit for carbon capture is a strong economic signal that the United States in fact wants heavy industry to remain in place and that the United States government will effectively pay for the entirety of carbon capture. These are clear differences in philosophy.