I agree. A right to know is fundamental, and I think that we're talking about people who are burdened with multiple sources and cumulative impacts of multiple product-based exposures, and their own attempts to manage those exposures. The labelling would be the absolute floor to support their ability to do that.
What we know is that labelling enables product reformulation, in that when you're forced to label hazardous ingredients, companies will reformulate their products, which takes the burden off the individual.
When products are cleaner and when products contain fewer hazardous ingredients, people who aren't able, because of their own socio-economic status, to make choices for cleaner, greener products.... This would make a much more equitable playing field for people who would like to make better and cleaner choices for their family, but are unable to do so.
In addition, I would say that the right to a healthy environment piece that you were talking about in terms of labelling and the right to know is, again, very much an absolutely basic piece of transparency when we are purchasing products. Our ability to know what's in those products shouldn't be in question.