Well, I'm looking at their submission, and the way it's framed, I don't think would be very helpful. I understand the intent, but it's not good enough.
The problem is that it simply indicates that as part of the discussion about the implementation framework, there is a suggestion that there be specification of the actions that the ministers will take when ambient air quality standards are exceeded. Since ambient air quality standards are not legally enforceable now, that phraseology would not get you anywhere, number one. Problem number two, as I said at the outset, is that some of Canada's ambient air quality standards, which are really guidelines, are as much as four times more lenient than the American standards. We need better standards, and they need to be legally enforceable.
While I understand their suggestion, it's not really going to get us where we need to go.