Essentially, we tried to sort of flow-chart how the decisions are made. You arrive after an assessment at a decision. Do you put something on schedule 1 or not? Look at it from the official standpoint. If you put it on schedule 1, you immediately trigger obligations—it's time-limited, you must develop risk management, you have a clock ticking—or you can put it on this new list and do nothing at all. You can imagine, in an overworked environment, what you would do.
So you end up, on this list, with nothing happening. If it's truly of concern, then are you going to monitor it? Are you going to research it? Are you going to chuck toys coming in at the border? What are you going to do if it's truly something of concern?
Frankly, I don't know how you would prove that a substance shouldn't be on the list, because everything is capable of becoming toxic in the CEPA definition. That's our concern. We think it kind of dangles there without doing anything that can't be done by other provisions in the act.