I think the Senate addressed a number of them.
The main concern we had was, of course, the ability of citizens to participate in the process, to provide evidence, to review evidence and to know how these living organisms are being assessed. I think the Senate amendments have gone a long way toward addressing that.
The “demonstrable need for the living organism” is the way that we would like to introduce the conversation about the ethical, cultural and social implications of genetically modifying animals when there are wild counterparts and the danger exists that those wild counterparts could be damaged by the genetically modified organism.