I appreciate that, because the work the committee is trying to do is to tighten up some of what could be seen as problematic aspects of the bill. If there is any further information that any of you could provide, it would certainly be helpful.
Could you describe for me some of the characteristics of a substance that would be of the highest risk?
I ask this because the Senate has provided some defining characteristics of what this would look like. One of the things I've heard concern around is that if it's defined in the act as a substance of highest risk, it doesn't necessarily allow the latitude for the experts within your department to ensure that it is defined properly on an ongoing basis. Could you provide some feedback on that?