The problem that we see is that industry will be struggling with this reality. When a company tries to set up in a location, some will say that the environment is vulnerable and others will say the opposite. At the end of the day, the company is the one who will try to find what constitutes a good location. This problem crops up when we introduce a term without a precise definition to guide us. When a company wants to set up somewhere, but we’re unable to define what is vulnerable and what isn’t, they are left to struggle with it, which delays investments and development.
Don’t forget that Canada is a world leader when it comes to development. We have to maintain very high standards. If the process gets slowed down by these kinds of vague concepts, then what is not done in Canada could be done in other countries, which are a great deal less concerned about determining whether certain situations are vulnerable or not.
So why not accelerate the process?