I've outlined precisely how that would happen. I'm happy to elaborate on any of those stages. Our amendments would really raise the bar for public participation. I can also speak to how demonstrable need would be determined, because that goes together with participation.
Someone said that this was impossible to implement, but, concerning our proposed section 104.1, we think that, in 90% of the cases, give or take, you would know the answer to that articulation of demonstrable need. You would know whether it poses a hazard to the wild counterpart or to biological diversity, or whether it does not. You would know whether it is benefiting biological diversity and bringing other social or environmental benefits or not. You don't need a lot of process to determine that in most cases. Where it doesn't, you have the public to weigh in, interrogate the evidence and help to make that determination.