I am not going to go back to the precautionary principle. That said, I will propose a definition of this principle when we get to clause 4 of the bill.
I want to say to Ms. May that I will vote for her amendment, even though in ecological and environmental circles the French word “durable” has been discussed for at least 10 years. Some people say that we should not say “durable”, but “viable”. I have participated in some of these discussions.
I find that Mr. McLean's arguments are also correct. Nevertheless, as a matter of principle and because it clearly mentions “environmental justice” and “polluter pays”, I will be voting for the amendment.