We're talking about definitions. I know there has been some discussion related to definitions in previous amendments, and one of the substantive changes that has been brought forward in this bill compared to previous iterations is the conversation around the right to a healthy environment.
Do the officials have comments on this definition, whether it's restrictive, whether it is, in fact, too broad, or whether it has some consequences in the interpretation of how other clauses affect the bill? I think that would be helpful for the committee.