Thank you.
I'm glad we talked about the implementation framework, because what is lacking in anything the United Nations puts forward is the implementation in jurisdictions that have the responsibility to do something of this nature. It is a bit of a paper tiger in that respect.
I want to look at the conundrum that we're talking about here, because we are putting something on paper that is a definition to be looked at going forward.
I want to address “clean”. Most of us here would say that “clean” would represent a lack of bacteria, and “healthy” might mean a lack of viruses, and “sustainable” would mean exactly the contrary, because the environment isn't sustained without some viruses and some bacteria. As a matter of fact, it's one of the phyla that make up a large portion of the earth, yet it's not considered to be clean to have a bunch of bacteria floating around in the environment. At least, most people, in interpreting this definition, wouldn't think so.
That's the conundrum I have, this whole classification of each of these three words that don't really jive together at all when you analyze them, and what people are going to interpret them to mean.
Are we going to say, yes, this is clean, or yes, this is healthy, or yes, this is sustainable? The three don't exist together.