Indeed, that would be the ruling from the chair.
The amendment seeks to amend sections 29 to 33 of CEPA. Again, “an amendment is inadmissible if it proposes to amend a statute that is not before the committee or a section of the parent Act, unless the latter is specifically amended by a clause of the bill.”
It's going directly to try to amend CEPA where, as I understand it, this issue is not mentioned in Bill S-5.
Yes, unfortunately it's out of scope, as I see it.
We now go to PV-9.
Ms. May.