Going forward, I'm fully in support of not using vertebrate animals for the testing we need. With the amendment—and the spirit of the amendment is very clear and very positive—I'm wondering if there is a gap between the words that are in the legislation right now and the words we're proposing to change them to.
As much as we're hoping for the gaps to be filled, is there a gap between the wordings being proposed in the amendment and the current state of where we are in Canada? Where things are going to be is obviously what we have our eye on all the time. Between that and where we are, are we going to have to fill the gap in the meantime? Is there anything missing here? If you don't mind my saying this, is the amendment a nicer way of saying exactly what's in the current legislation? If not, is there a gap between what's in the amendment and what's in the legislation?
The question is for Mr. Carreau.