I understand the government's concern about changing from “highest risk” to “highest concern”, but I think that in addressing this, taking out the specific references to “carcinogenic, mutagenic” and “toxic to reproduction” does a bit of a disservice, especially given the testimony we heard earlier about explicitly referencing these pieces.
I propose a subamendment, keeping the change to “the highest risk” but reading “classification of a substance as a substance that is carcinogenic, mutagenic, toxic to reproduction or poses the highest risk”.