I'm very sympathetic to what this amendment is trying to do and to the arguments being made, but my issue is that since the entire regime was changed and the bill was overhauled, going back and trying to put in one area of this virtual elimination and create this list now, when there's a new approach being suggested, seems to me to not work with what's been done already.
While I hear what you're saying, I also feel that the realities or the problems with actually implementing this concept were considered when they put forward the bill, and they tried to address those in a comprehensive way. If we now go back and say, “Well, we fixed the virtual elimination; let's put it back in”, I don't see how that works completely.
I understand what you're saying, but I'm really hoping that we're going to see a lot of strengthening in the regulations as well, which are obviously going to be very important in this case.
I can't support this amendment.