I appreciate the reference to what we previously debated, but we're removing all of the current proposed (g.1), and replacing it with something that seems completely different. Should it be added to or should it be...? What are we missing here?
Proposed new paragraph (g.1) right now says:
amended by adding the following after paragraph (g):
(g.1) prescribing processes for meaningful participation in (i) an assessment under section 108, and
(ii) the determination of whether to grant a waiver requested under subsection 106(8);
Do you want to take those lines on public participation out and just talk about prescribing a living organism or group of living organisms for the purpose of new subsection 108(1)?
Could you give us some context, Mr. Weiler?