No. It's to “consult any interested persons”. There is a clear obligation to consult interested persons, including indigenous people and including vulnerable populations.
The second part of Madam Pauzé's amendment, however, is where the contradiction arises, and that is to create an obligation for an authority to develop regulations, prescribing processes for meaningful public participation and the decision about whether to grant a waiver.
We dealt with that in the committee when you weren't here. The amendment to CEPA that was created earlier this week requires the minister to publish waiver decisions as soon as possible.
I'm pointing out that there's a contradiction there between meaningful public participation in that process and the statutory obligation to publish that list as soon as possible. There's no contradiction with—