Sure.
The main difference is that the Senate amendment required a report every five years, but this reporting requirement is now going to be part of the annual report.
Also, I think the Senate amendment talked about reporting on details on measures implemented to ensure that the act is administered in a way that complies with section 35, which is about the principle of the honour of the Crown and Canada's treaty relationships and fiduciary obligations to aboriginal peoples. That wording has been.... Instead of using those concepts, it says that the reporting must include measures taken to advance reconciliation as reflected in section 35 and in the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act.
Then I would say that otherwise the Senate amendment also wanted to include a report on any evaluations or findings or recommendations in respect of the administration of the act as it relates to the aboriginal peoples of Canada, and subsection (c) of the proposed amendment sort of said that in a different way. It refers to findings or recommendations of any report made under an act of Parliament in respect of the administration of the act. It's just defining it in a way that makes it more inclusive.