I have a quick question about this jurisdiction piece. In our previous conversations around provincial jurisdiction, my understanding of what you said was that when it came to pollution hot spots, the provincial and territorial jurisdictions are respected in these acts.
I guess part of me is tempted to suggest putting in the same subamendment, which was voted down before, about respecting provincial and territorial jurisdictions, if that is a concern here for proposed subsection 2.1(a). I'm a bit confused about why it would be a concern here and not for pollution hot spots.