Thank you, Mr. Chair.
To answer Madame Pauzé's question, the language used in relation to air quality is consistent with the language Madame Pauzé has proposed as well. I wanted to reference that.
In my opinion, when we're talking about a right to a healthy environment, the requirement to “protect” it rather than just “consider” it would be a much stronger way of articulating that type of implementation framework.
Lastly, on the deletion of “reasonable limits”, there's nothing preventing the future minister from introducing that within the framework itself. It just removes it as a fundamental requirement to do that.