It's a complicated answer, I'd have to say. It will take some time to create trust. It's not going to be a one-sided answer.
As I stated, the regulator is a pretty one-sided organization in the consultation that goes on and the projects that get approved. The JRP, the joint review panel, that was given for Imperial and the concern that was not followed through on during the application is a good example. How can a process like this be trustworthy when concerns were given from the beginning and they were not followed through? As I said, there is a generational trauma from not necessarily being told the truth for decades. That is something that will have to be repaired.
I think there will need to be some very big changes within the regulatory system. It may be something that perhaps could be completely overhauled, or perhaps there should be more of a co-management approach with Canada. Maybe the oil sands need to be more co-managed within the two governments, with more collaboration with the communities.
It is the communities' land, and it is the land that communities will end up with after everyone has left. That is the most important thing. They are staying here, and this is the land they are going to be left with, so if that trust is....
Sorry. I tend to ramble.