This is unusual, because we got notice of the motion that references the testimony of the witnesses pretty much as the meeting was starting. It seems a little in bad faith to move a motion referencing that we didn't get answers from the witnesses before the witnesses had even started to testify. That just seems a little bit odd. We actually got notice of this motion some time ago, largely as this meeting was starting.
To the Liberal member, before we vote on this motion, I'm curious. Did you know what the witnesses were going to say before the meeting even started? You may have, but it does seem odd to move a motion—