Time's up.
Before we go to the second round, I have a question.
I will quote from an article in The Globe and Mail last week. It says:
However, independent sampling commissioned by the regulator concluded last week that a small, fish-bearing lake at the northeastern edge of the Kearl site now contains levels of toxins that exceed government guidelines. The lake, which feeds into a tributary of the Firebag River, also contains naphthenic acids, which are formed from the breakdown of petrochemicals...
My understanding is that there's monitoring going on around this lake that feeds into the Firebag River. Am I correct in assuming that?