Thank you very much.
I was listening with interest when you were talking about the international review and how every three years, as a signatory, you go before an international body.
The United States Department of Energy also produced an international review panel report in 2020 for the Chalk River laboratory site, and in that report, they had 35 recommendations, 76 suggestions, and five best practices that would be followed.
In keeping with that comment you made about being a signatory and getting this feedback, were there any specific proposals that came back from that United States Department of Energy study that had been implemented or that you considered moving forward?
I guess a more basic question for me is: Why did the U.S. Department of Energy conduct a study of Chalk River?